Fasting and circadian rhythms
T recently did a rather interesting post about fasting and the subsequent discussion in the comments section warrants a post of it's own on my blog because #1 it's too lengthy to explain on a comment without hogging up significant comment-space on her blog and #2 well it's an interesting topic in it's own right.
So - fasting. Either you do it or you don't. Your reasons for doing it might vary too, maybe it's something you've done all your life so you can't imagine not doing it. Maybe you're doing it to learn self control, to appreciate the things we take for granted, or dare I say, to avoid the wrath of a god. Whatever.
The point I made in T's post was that fasting probably could have a negative impact on health and well-being, looking at it from a purely biological point of view*. I make no claims on the psychological benefits (or placebo effects if you will). I'm sure people who do it year in year out feel good about it afterwards, and are filled with a sense of accomplishment and all that jazz. This post is purely about the physiological/biological impact of fasting, so if you do read this and get filled with a self-righteous urge to comment with a "don't knock it till you try it, I had an awesome time with it", please refrain. I haven't tried walking on hot live coals either, and I'm sure the folks that do it can attest to how great they feel afterwards (symbolic self-sacrificial acts of devotion et cetera) but umm yeah there are some things you don't need to try to 'knock', so to speak.
Normally, us humans tend to eat three meals a day (breakfast lunch and dinner) during the daytime hours and sleep during the night hours. During the fasting period of Ramadan both food and drink are not permitted during daylight hours, so 'fasters' eat and get more active when their bodies are 'used to' or 'preparing to' wind down for the night. This would in turn affect the circadian rhythm, leading to an increase in production of stress hormones such as cortisol and testosterone. Also well documented is the effect of fasting on the release of leptin, a hormone responsible for regulating appetite and weight (remember those genetically engineered 'fat mice' that caused a bit of a hoo-ha a while back? Those mice had mutant copies of a gene that prevented them from producing any leptin - As a result those mice were unaware of when they have sufficient amounts of fat stored so they overeat and become obese). Fasting also seems to affect the levels of melatonin, a hormone released at night to induce sleep. A brief Pubmed search also seems to indicate that fasting seems to affect sleep patterns. Delayed sleep onset and impairment of sleep structure (more importantly time spent on REM sleep was decreased) were a few of these side effects.
I'm sure that these relatively minor side effects on health are far outweighed by the positive psychological impact that 'fasters' get. As is evident by the comments on T's post, the sense of accomplishment, the "I've got the self control to actually go through with it", the "now I can truly appreciate my three meals a day and feel bad for the people who aren't as fortunate" (call me cynical, but I personally don't need to starve/mutilate/rape/murder myself to feel empathy for others subjected to the same misfortunes) and even the concept of "accumulating brownie points with god for the afterlife entry into heaven" are probably powerful enough feel-good factors to negate whatever physiological side effects fasting might have.
Personally though, thanks but no thanks.
* Of course biologically speaking, fasting can have many beneficial effects too, such as cutting down blood pressure, diabetes etc. However, that is because fasting enforces you to cut down/watch your diet, something you should be doing anyway if your BMI is higher than it should be. Bottom line - the pros of fasting will far outweigh the cons if you happen to be an orca type that snorts a dozen Krispy Kremes every hour on a normal day and then suddenly quit for the better part of the day during fasting.
So - fasting. Either you do it or you don't. Your reasons for doing it might vary too, maybe it's something you've done all your life so you can't imagine not doing it. Maybe you're doing it to learn self control, to appreciate the things we take for granted, or dare I say, to avoid the wrath of a god. Whatever.
The point I made in T's post was that fasting probably could have a negative impact on health and well-being, looking at it from a purely biological point of view*. I make no claims on the psychological benefits (or placebo effects if you will). I'm sure people who do it year in year out feel good about it afterwards, and are filled with a sense of accomplishment and all that jazz. This post is purely about the physiological/biological impact of fasting, so if you do read this and get filled with a self-righteous urge to comment with a "don't knock it till you try it, I had an awesome time with it", please refrain. I haven't tried walking on hot live coals either, and I'm sure the folks that do it can attest to how great they feel afterwards (symbolic self-sacrificial acts of devotion et cetera) but umm yeah there are some things you don't need to try to 'knock', so to speak.
Normally, us humans tend to eat three meals a day (breakfast lunch and dinner) during the daytime hours and sleep during the night hours. During the fasting period of Ramadan both food and drink are not permitted during daylight hours, so 'fasters' eat and get more active when their bodies are 'used to' or 'preparing to' wind down for the night. This would in turn affect the circadian rhythm, leading to an increase in production of stress hormones such as cortisol and testosterone. Also well documented is the effect of fasting on the release of leptin, a hormone responsible for regulating appetite and weight (remember those genetically engineered 'fat mice' that caused a bit of a hoo-ha a while back? Those mice had mutant copies of a gene that prevented them from producing any leptin - As a result those mice were unaware of when they have sufficient amounts of fat stored so they overeat and become obese). Fasting also seems to affect the levels of melatonin, a hormone released at night to induce sleep. A brief Pubmed search also seems to indicate that fasting seems to affect sleep patterns. Delayed sleep onset and impairment of sleep structure (more importantly time spent on REM sleep was decreased) were a few of these side effects.
I'm sure that these relatively minor side effects on health are far outweighed by the positive psychological impact that 'fasters' get. As is evident by the comments on T's post, the sense of accomplishment, the "I've got the self control to actually go through with it", the "now I can truly appreciate my three meals a day and feel bad for the people who aren't as fortunate" (call me cynical, but I personally don't need to starve/mutilate/rape/murder myself to feel empathy for others subjected to the same misfortunes) and even the concept of "accumulating brownie points with god for the afterlife entry into heaven" are probably powerful enough feel-good factors to negate whatever physiological side effects fasting might have.
Personally though, thanks but no thanks.
* Of course biologically speaking, fasting can have many beneficial effects too, such as cutting down blood pressure, diabetes etc. However, that is because fasting enforces you to cut down/watch your diet, something you should be doing anyway if your BMI is higher than it should be. Bottom line - the pros of fasting will far outweigh the cons if you happen to be an orca type that snorts a dozen Krispy Kremes every hour on a normal day and then suddenly quit for the better part of the day during fasting.



9 people quipped in...:
Thanks for the info :D
I haven't voluntarily fasted but have missed and skipped meals, and it aint fun.
Anyway my eating habits are all haywire. Light b'fast and big dinners, totally upside down, that is not good either eh? :(
Fasting is for fatties and anorexics
I missed these informative sciency posts of yours that you write so well:) Thought I'd delurk myself a bit to tell you that!
that was a very informative post....
Thanks for all the info..I knew there were negative impacts of fasting... but didn't quite know them to this extent..
I'm the same Anon who commented on T's blog.
“umm yeah there are some things you don't need to try to 'knock', so to speak.”
Agreed. I apologise, and withdraw my recommendation that everyone try fasting at least once. It’s my personal (subjective) opinion, and not everyone will get something positive out of the experience!
On the science part, I also heard somewhere that your stomach increases digestive acids around your usual meal-times, is that right? And the person said that not eating at the proper times can potentially cause long-term bowel problems, as if there’s no food to digest, the acids start to break down the stomach lining. Another scientific argument against fasting? I’d appreciate your input as a medic!
“(call me cynical, but I personally don't need to starve/mutilate/rape/murder myself to feel empathy for others subjected to the same misfortunes)”
That’s a bit unfair. I wasn’t saying that I didn’t empathise with starving Africans before I tried fasting. I was just saying that there are some things that I myself take for granted every day, and it’s nice to be reminded once in a way of what I have and how I should be thankful for it. When I saw a starving kid I always empathised, but fasting gave me a (miniscule) idea of what that kid’s daily life must be like.
Same concept when I meet disabled people, for example. I empathise that their life is harder than mine, but it was only when I broke my leg that I got a (miniscule) idea of how different my life would be if I was perhaps born without the use of my leg.
I guess my point was that it’s easier to empathise when you have a common frame of reference.
Interesting post, keep up the great blogging!
Fasting is a sacrifice and like all sacrfices it certainly must have negative effects on the physical body or else its purpose wont be achieved.
The sacrifice of fasting is putting oneself into the position of the hungry, thirsty and poor thus attempting to provide an incentive to give.
We humans do so many things, knowingly, that are detrimental to ourselves all of the time.
Dont we?
Once I fasted for 4 days on diluted juice and vege broth only. It had nothing to do with religion/self control/experience or any other mumbo jumbo.
I did it to starve my body enabling it to eat stored up fat for energy.
It was extremely hard the first day.I was constantly hungry and consantly drinking, didn't have strength to get up and felt lethargic. Amazingly as the day progressed on the second day I didn't need to drink as much and by the third day I had to remind myself to keep up the fluids and was begining to feel good. By day 4 i was feeling fit and wonderful and could have fasted endlessly if not for my desires for life's little pleasures creeping in.
My fasting was purely for vanity and to look good.Any health benefits is/was a bonus.
Wow... fasting sure seems to put quite a number of hormones out of whack huh? Wonder if the drop in melatonin is significant enough to make the master clock go dizzy as well. Pretty fascinating stuff though...
Anyhoo... guess we all have our own ways of "keeping the faith".
Azrael: You're welcome:) Nope irregular eating habits aren't healthy either, you should maybe look into sorting that out...
Anon: Quite!
Anon2: Aww thanks! It's always great to get specific feedback like that, so I appreciate your comment. And thanks for de-lurking!
LD: Yeah I looked it up briefly before typing out this post as I wanted to be quite specific. Glad you found it informative:)
Anon3: Yeah the stomach acid thing is true, but I don't think it would be a problem for fasters unless they're already prone to stomach ulcers and the like. I'm not a medic though, so you might want to check that from a more reliable source! Regarding the empathy, I think I get what you mean, so I apologise if I sounded overly harsh or unfair. It's just a pet peeve of mine when people get all patronising and condescending about empathising with the less fortunate . Glad you like the blog anyway:)
Oneplusone: Again as I said before, I don't need hunger as an incentive to give. It just all seems a bit hypocritical to me.
Mia: That sounds pretty extreme! Are you sure you felt good afterwards for real or were you delirious perhaps?:)
Entrpy: Yeah I think it could as the master clock is regulated by the external light/dark cues.
Post a Comment